Assignment #9

PPol 604
Due: Thursday, 21 March 2013

Type up your answers. Give proper credit to those you work with and/or the text(s).

Solve the following problems. Show all of your work, but keep your answers concise. Highlight your (final) answer to distinguish it from your other numbers and text. Include a copy of your input (e.g. do file) or output (e.g. log file), when it is an appropriate way to show your work. However, do not include unnecessary output (i.e. no data dumps), and format any output so that it is easily readable. An appropriate time to include output is when you put your results in a table--if your results are wrong, then the grader has no idea how you came to your conclusions (i.e. give partial credit) unless you provide some output. Explanation includes statistical and substantive explanation (explain so that a statistical layperson can understand it, and so that a statistical analyst will see your erudition).

  1. {50} [from Zorn and Van Winkle 2000 via Singer and Willett 2003] Singer and Willett present data on the time to retirement or death for U.S. Supreme Court justices. The data set found here contains data on the time to retirement or death for U.S. Supreme Court justices. for this problem, retirement constitutes a failure, and death constitutes censoring. Reproduce the data analysis of CGGM, Chapters 8-9, using this data set, including:
  2. {50} [from King, Alt, Burns, and Laver 1990 via Box-Steffensmeier and Jones 2004] Why do different cabinets fail more quickly than others? The data set found here contains data on the survival of 313 (mostly) European cabinet governments if 15 countries. DURAT is how long the cabinet lasts (in months). We will first replicate King et al.'s analysis with seven covariates. The first, INVEST, is a binary variable denoting whether or not an initial confirmatory vote is required by the legislature. This legal requirement is a "hurdle" that governments must overcome. The second covariate, POLAR, measures the percentage of support for extremist parties. The idea here is that as the support for extremist parties increases, the degree of polarization in the government will increase. The third covariate of interest is a binary indicator denoting whether or not the government has a numerical majority: NUMST2. The fourth covariate is a count of the number of attempts to form a government prior to the official formation of the government: FORMAT. The fifth covariate is a binary indicator denoting if the government was formed immediately after an election: ELTIME2 (as opposed to forming in the middle of an election cycle, which means a cabinet failed but the new cabinet formed without an election). The sixth covariate is a binary indicator denoting whether or not the government is serving as a "caretaker" government: CARETK2. And the seventh covariate is a measure of fractionalization: FRACT. The variable, CIEP12, denotes whether a cabinet failed. It is coded 1 if the cabinet failed, and 0 if the cabinet did not fail, or ended within 12 months of the "constitutional interelection period," which requires that an election be called and the cabinet disbanded.

Back to Assignments page