Study Questions for Chalmers, Chapters 5-6
- What is the author's main point?
- What is falsifiability?
- Why is it important?
- What degree of falsifiability is preferred? Why? How is this achieved?
- How are mistakes/errors helpful?
- Does theory precede or follow observation for a falsificationist? Why?
- How are theories proved?
- What is the difference between sophisticated and regular ("naive")
falsificationism?
- What is an ad hoc modification?
- What modifications to a theory are acceptable?
- What is the role of confirmation?
- When are significant advances made in science?
- What is background knowledge?
- What is the difference between inductivism and falsificationism?
- Why does any of this matter to political scientists?
Things to look for/keep in mind for future readings:
- what research traditions emphasize falisifiability
Back to
Syllabus